Bush and 9/11 -- his own words betray his involvement
It seemed pretty strange from the beginning that Bush Junior let all those Saudis including bin Laden family members fly out of the country shortly after 9/11 when all other commercial air traffic was grounded. Michael Moore covered the topic pretty well in his famous movie Fahrenheit 9/11 but he didn't suggest any reason why it was allowed to happen that the people most likely to lead us to Osama bin Laden were allowed to flee the country. We are left with the implicit suggestion that Bush had some good reason to allow the bin Ladens to escape. This didn't make any sense however until Bush goofed and implicated himself in the 9/11 attacks; now it all fits.
It seems almost too unbelievable to be possible: a sitting president complicit in the attacks of 9/11. But Bush's own words can only be true if that's the case. Below are Bush's own words, verifiable on the White House website, which confirm what Bush accidentally said (the first time) and then covered up with a liar's bravado by repeating it a SECOND time. Bush says TWICE he saw the first plane hit the Twin Towers, which is only possible if he had a private video feed, because there was no live coverage of the first plane to hit. His handlers would obviously have never let him repeat such a thing a second time if it had made a simple mistake about it the first time.
It has been my experience (having had to deal all too often with a psychopathic liar in my life plus one or two minor ones) that liars get their stories confused sometimes. If it was just a problem with Bush's memory, he wouldn't have repeated the story a SECOND time, because his handlers (Rove & co-conspirators) would have corrected him and he wouldn't have repeated himself. The fact that he did repeat himself however is a significant event because it's one way that liars talk themselves out of getting caught; by asserting the lie a second time they create the impression that they are quite certain of the facts and you are left with a vague doubt that you must be missing something. Since nobody likes to admit they've been asleep at the switch, they tend to just let it pass and give the liar the benefit of the doubt. Some people trying hard to give Bush the benefit of the doubt maintain that he was really talking about seeing the SECOND plane crash, but then his story would make no sense at all: if he had seen the SECOND crash he would have known by then about the FIRST one, and he wouldn't be thinking it was some kind of accident due to poor piloting. And we know that Andy Card told him about the SECOND crash, not the first, in the now-famous schoolroom scene exploited so well by Michael Moore where Bush sat there for 7 minutes with his thumb up his ass not knowing what to do. The timing bears that out too, as you mention.
The question is, what exactly was Bush lying about? He'd have to be pretty dumb (even dumber than most of us believe him to be) to just fabricate the complete story about seeing the first plane crash, knowing that it was 'impossible' for him to have seen it. On the other hand, if he did see the first plane crash, just about the only way that could have been possible would have been through a private video feed, which would surely implicate him as having not only foreknowledge of the event but being part of the plot (the elder Bush's Carlyle Group and the bin Laden family are all buddies, remember).
The way I see it, Bush was ad-libbing one day and shooting his mouth off in that particularly Texan fashion of his (I used to live in Houston, where it's not uncommon to observe) when suddenly he realizes he's said something nobody's supposed to know about (him seeing the first crash) but he quickly covers it up, first with a distracting quip about thinking what a poor pilot that was and he knows because he used to be a pilot (call that Lie One), then he further mentions that he saw the first crash while he was waiting outside the classroom (call that Lie Two). It turns out from the timing of events that Bush almost certainly knew about the first crash before arriving in his limo at the school (Kia Baskerville, a CBS News producer traveling with Bush that morning, received a message about a plane crash "as the presidential motorcade headed to President Bush's first event." - see An Interesting Day: President Bush's Movements and Actions on 9/11). See also the MORE EVIDENCE video below suggesting the first crash might have even happened shortly before Bush left his hotel. Whichever case is true may not be highly relevant however because we already know Bush's story cannot be true since there was no live video coverage of the first attack.
The only way this story makes any sense is if Bush is a liar (remember the phantom WMDs and his 2000 election promises about protecting the environment, pretending he didn't know who was behind the Valerie Plame outing, etc.) and if he was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Otherwise you have to bend over backward to give him the benefit of the doubt that 1) he said he saw the first crash but he meant the second, 2) he didn't really mean it somehow when he said he thought the first crash he saw was just due to poor piloting, 3) he forgot he was actually in his limo instead of waiting outside the classroom when he heard about the first crash, 4) there wasn't really any news video going on outside the classroom like Bush said there was and he's just confused. Give him all the benefit of the doubt that you would an Alzheimer's patient, a delusional nut case, and then MAYBE you can explain away Bush's story that he said TWICE as being an innocent mistake of comprehension on his part. But knowing what we know now about Bush's character and secret agendas (the war on Iraq being planned well before 9/11, the assault on Social Security being a ploy to create more Republicans because studies have shown that people who invest in the stock market tend to vote Republican, Bush never mentioning that his crook daddy and the crook Reagan gave Saddam WMDs in the 1980's, etc.), knowing what we know about Bush the most parsimonious explanation is not total confusion on his part TWICE but that he was complicit in the attacks, and that indeed he did see the first plane crash into the WTC from his limo on a private video feed.
This now-censored video contained as of 08.20.2007 some of Bush's lies in his own voice. Now someone has removed the video from YouTube, maybe it will reappear one day so it is left here as continuing evidence of the 9/11 coverup's methodology of censorship. One way or the other however, it's abundantly clear that Bush's own words prove he is either deliberately lying or else he's delusional, no other possibilies exist. If his words are lies he's complicit in the 9/11 attacks, and if he's simply delusional well he's got the power to launch World War Three so in that case you should perhaps worry even more about how much your life may be at risk for as long as he's in the Oval Office. Think about it.
MORE EVIDENCE that Bush was lying in his official statements documented on the White House website. He claims he saw the first plane hit the WTC while he was waiting outside the classroom. Since that's impossible because there were no known live TV cameras randomly transmitting WTC views, it makes one wonder exactly when did Bush see the first crash, if he did at all. Some have speculated he may have had a private video feed. Earlier above it was mentioned that a news report suggested he learned about it during the limo ride from his hotel to the school, but the news video below is pretty good evidence Bush already knew about the first attack on the way out of his hotel. Did he plan his departure so that he could be in plain view of reporters when Andy Card apparently whispered into his ear the news of the first attack? Dick Cheney was out of view running the biggest terrorist hijacking "simulation" in history and overriding NORAD's command and control, so the only question there is, was that just about the most amazing fucking coincidence one can imagine, or was it no coincidence? Ultimately you have to be the judge of the evidence and hopefully not already hypnotized into denial by what you'd like to believe. I didn't want to believe it at first either, but now the evidence is growing so massive it can't be denied.
Then there's this INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE that WTC 7 was "pulled". The owner of the building, Larry Silverstein, slipped up while the cameras were on him:
This video shows the BBC reporting the destruction of WTC 7 BEFORE it actually occurred! Apparently someone slipped up and let loose a press release too early.
Here are a few more links so you won't think these are isolated bits of evidence taken out of context or that this idea is only circulating among a few lefty wackos. Are you aware that HALF of all New Yorkers believe Bush had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks? That is a lot of people, yet where are the L.A. Times articles about it? NADA. The mainstream media are giving Bush a complete pass on this. zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855
If this doesn't make your skin crawl, nothing will. The Sibel Edmonds story: www.breakfornews.com/Sibel-Edmonds.htm
Some people are suing Bush under the RICO act, claiming he had prior knowledge of 9/11: http://www.911forthetruth.com
A general site about the search for truth about 9/11: www.septembereleventh.org
My feeling is that if Bush and his crew were scrupulously honest people, that one or two little 'accidents' of speech could be legitimately explained as honest mistakes. But since Bush and Rumsfeld and most of the others are such egregious liars (see the Rumsfeld video above, don't forget the hype about WMDs, etc.) they should not and do not deserve the benefit of the doubt. Bush even fought hard against the formation of a 9/11 commission (see www.septembereleventh.org/newsarchive/2003-11-14-kseditorial.php). It is pretty obvious that Bush is hiding something and that he was complicit to some extent in the 9/11 attacks.
You USED to be able to watch the liar caught off guard when asked about his involvement in 9/11, displaying a highly guilty reaction. Now the video has been "removed by the user", kinda makes you wonder why he'd put it up in the first place if he was going to remove it, eh?
This topic was originally inspired by a page at serendipity.ptpi.net/wot/bushflub.htm that has also now mysteriously vanished. Fortunately there is another very good analysis of this topic at 911blimp.net with Bush's own words incriminating him in the 9/11 attacks. Whoops.
Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II
© 2017 Censored.StrategicBrains.com
All rights reserved